BREAKING NEWS
policy

Belgium's FSMA Flags Six Unlicensed Crypto Firms Post-MiCA Deadline

Belgium's financial regulator added six crypto providers to its fraud warning list shortly after the EU's MiCA transitional period closed.

Belgium's Financial Services and Markets Authority (FSMA) has moved swiftly in the wake of Europe's landmark cryptocurrency regulatory transition, warning consumers about six crypto-asset service providers that appear to be operating without proper authorization. The action came just days after the European Union's MiCA transitional period officially expired — a deadline that required crypto firms doing business in the EU to either secure full licensing or exit regulated markets.

The timing is significant. MiCA, the Markets in Crypto-Assets regulation, represented years of legislative effort to bring digital asset businesses under a unified European framework. The expiration of its transitional grace period marks the moment when enforcement moves from theoretical to immediate, and regulators like the FSMA now have clearer legal standing to name and warn against non-compliant operators.

Read more Khamenei Funeral Sends a Signal About Iran's Regional Ambitions →

By adding these six firms to its fraudulent crypto-asset service provider list, the FSMA is signaling that Belgium intends to treat the post-MiCA environment as a genuine enforcement era — not simply a continuation of the looser oversight that characterized earlier years. For consumers, such public lists serve a dual purpose: they discourage engagement with unlicensed platforms and put the broader industry on notice that regulators are actively monitoring compliance.

The broader implications extend well beyond Belgium. As a member state of the EU, Belgium's proactive stance could foreshadow a wave of similar enforcement actions across the bloc, particularly in jurisdictions that had been slower to act. Crypto firms that relied on transitional provisions to continue operating without full MiCA authorization now face a sharply narrowed window before they encounter formal regulatory consequences. The message from European regulators appears unified: the grace period is over, and operating outside the licensed framework carries real reputational and legal risk.

Continue reading at Cointelegraph.

Continue reading at Cointelegraph →

Frequently Asked Questions

Q.What is the MiCA transitional period and why does it matter?

The MiCA transitional period was a grace window under the EU's Markets in Crypto-Assets regulation that allowed crypto firms to continue operating while pursuing full licensing. Its expiration means firms must now be fully authorized or face regulatory action.

Q.What did Belgium's FSMA do after the MiCA deadline passed?

The FSMA added six crypto-asset service providers to its list of fraudulent or unauthorized CASPs, warning consumers to avoid these platforms shortly after the MiCA transitional period expired.

Q.What is a fraudulent CASP list and how does it protect consumers?

A fraudulent CASP list is a public register maintained by a financial regulator that identifies crypto-asset service providers operating without proper authorization, helping consumers avoid potentially unsafe or illegal platforms.

More in policy →