80 Nations Call for Open Hormuz Strait at UN Summit
A broad coalition at the United Nations demands the Strait of Hormuz be reopened and condemns Iran and Houthi attacks on shipping.
A coalition of 80 countries took an unusually united stand at the United Nations, demanding the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz and issuing a joint condemnation of attacks linked to Iran and the Houthi movement in Yemen. The breadth of that coalition — spanning developed economies and developing nations alike — signals growing alarm over the cascading consequences of disrupted maritime traffic through one of the world's most strategically critical waterways.
The Strait of Hormuz is the narrow passage between Iran and Oman through which roughly a fifth of the world's oil supply transits daily. Any prolonged closure or sustained threat to navigation there ripples outward almost immediately: energy markets tighten, shipping insurance premiums spike, and supply chains serving Asia, Europe, and beyond absorb significant cost pressures. The willingness of 80 governments to formally align on this issue underscores how broadly those economic risks are felt.
Read more Iran-US Nuclear Talks Stall as Tehran Vows No Surrender →
The joint statement also singles out Houthi attacks, which have targeted commercial vessels in the Red Sea and surrounding waters as part of a campaign the group has framed as solidarity with Palestinians in Gaza. Critics, including the countries represented at the UN meeting, argue the strikes indiscriminately endanger civilian mariners and global commerce, irrespective of stated political motivations. Iran has faced separate but related condemnation for its alleged role in enabling or directing destabilizing activity in the region.
Diplomatic pressure of this scale rarely produces immediate behavioral change from actors like Iran or the Houthis, who have demonstrated a willingness to absorb international criticism. What the UN statement does accomplish is to isolate those actors politically, potentially laying groundwork for additional multilateral economic or legal measures. Whether this coalition can translate rhetorical consensus into coordinated enforcement action remains the defining question going forward.
Continue reading at Reuters
