BREAKING NEWS
policy

Egypt, UAE and Saudi Arabia Side With Greece Against Turkey-Libya Sea Deal

Summarized from Reuters

Three Arab nations have aligned with Greece in contesting the controversial Turkey-Libya maritime agreement, deepening regional fractures over Eastern Mediterranean boundaries.

Egypt, UAE and Saudi Arabia Side With Greece Against Turkey-Libya Sea Deal

A significant diplomatic front is forming in the Eastern Mediterranean as Egypt, the United Arab Emirates, and Saudi Arabia have expressed support for Greece in its ongoing dispute with Turkey and Libya over a contested maritime boundary accord. The alignment signals that what began as a bilateral territorial disagreement has matured into a broader geopolitical fault line, with Arab heavyweights choosing sides in a conflict that carries major implications for offshore energy rights and regional influence.

The Turkey-Libya memorandum of understanding, signed in 2019, drew immediate condemnation from Athens, which argued the deal illegally overlooks the island of Crete and effectively carves through Greek-claimed exclusive economic zone waters. Greece's position has long been that Turkey's agreement with Libya's Tripoli-based government violates international maritime law, a view now apparently shared — at least diplomatically — by three of the Arab world's most economically and militarily consequential states.

Read more Qatar Signals Iran Must Show Good Faith for Nuclear Talks to Advance →

The backing from Cairo, Abu Dhabi, and Riyadh is more than symbolic. Egypt already has its own rival maritime delimitation agreement with Greece, signed in 2020, which directly contradicts the Turkey-Libya deal by establishing overlapping jurisdictional claims in the same waters. The UAE and Saudi Arabia, for their part, have long viewed Turkey's regional ambitions with suspicion, particularly Ankara's support for Islamist-aligned factions during the Libyan civil war. This convergence of interests makes the coalition a strategically coherent, if loosely formalized, counterweight to Turkish influence.

For Ankara, the development represents a diplomatic setback, though Turkish officials have consistently dismissed international criticism of the maritime pact as legally unfounded. The dispute remains unresolved in any binding international forum, and the underlying tension over Eastern Mediterranean energy exploration — including rights to potentially vast natural gas reserves — ensures the issue will remain a live geopolitical contest for years to come. How Greece leverages this Arab support in multilateral settings, including within NATO where Turkey is also a member, will be closely watched.

Continue reading at Reuters.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q.What is the Turkey-Libya maritime accord and why is it controversial?

The Turkey-Libya memorandum of understanding, signed in 2019, establishes a maritime boundary between the two countries that Greece argues illegally disregards the island of Crete and cuts through waters Greece claims as its exclusive economic zone under international law.

Q.Why did Egypt, the UAE, and Saudi Arabia support Greece in this dispute?

Egypt has its own 2020 maritime delimitation agreement with Greece that directly conflicts with the Turkey-Libya deal, while the UAE and Saudi Arabia have broader strategic concerns about Turkey's regional ambitions, including Ankara's support for Islamist-aligned factions in the Libyan civil war.

Q.How does this dispute relate to Eastern Mediterranean energy resources?

The contested maritime boundaries overlap with areas believed to contain significant natural gas reserves, making the resolution of territorial claims directly tied to which countries can legally authorize and profit from offshore energy exploration in the region.

More in policy →