Florida's Stop WOKE Act Blocked Again, Supreme Court Fight Looms
A Trump-appointed judge upheld a block on DeSantis' Stop WOKE Act, keeping Florida's college speech restrictions on ice as a SCOTUS battle approaches.
A federal appeals court has dealt another legal setback to Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis' signature campus speech legislation, known as the Stop WOKE Act, with a Trump-appointed judge siding against the state and leaving the law's restrictions on college classroom speech effectively suspended. The ruling extends what has become a prolonged judicial standoff over one of the most closely watched state-level efforts to regulate how race and identity topics are taught in higher education.
The Stop WOKE Act, formally styled as the Individual Freedom Act, sought to prohibit instruction that could cause students to feel guilt or discomfort based on their race or sex — a framework critics characterized as a sweeping curtailment of academic freedom and faculty speech rights. Courts have repeatedly found those provisions constitutionally suspect, particularly under First Amendment standards that set a high bar for government regulation of speech inside public university classrooms.
Read more Beijing Eyes Restrictions on Overseas Access to Chinese AI Models →
What makes this ruling analytically significant is the judicial profile of the author. A jurist appointed by a Republican president finding against a Republican governor's marquee culture-war legislation signals that the legal vulnerabilities in the Stop WOKE Act transcend partisan framing. The First Amendment concerns appear durable enough to survive ideological alignment, complicating the state's path to victory even in a more conservative judicial environment.
With the appeals court block now reinforced, Florida faces a consequential strategic choice: accept the ruling or escalate to the U.S. Supreme Court, which has shown some appetite for revisiting speech and education jurisprudence in recent terms. A high court appeal could ultimately shape not just Florida policy but the legal boundaries of what states across the country may permissibly restrict in public university instruction — making this a case with national implications far beyond the original legislation.
Continue reading at CNBC.
